MAGNUM

Thursday, October 15, 2009


Part One

“Man make love then go war [sic] then jealous beat up adversary and steal his wealth and his woman.” Bukowski

Four females I know have reported recent and fairly unpleasant run-ins with Art Jocks (AJs). To the uninitiated it works like this: girl (Art Chic) walks into restaurant/bar/museum/bingo parlor. AJ and his friends all snigger and turn their backs on said girl, who was an ex-girlfriend/lover/shag, and (once) a mutual friend. AJ and his friends exchange very sly knowing looks, cough, roll their eyes and bad mouth said girl (AJs do this in an animated whisper), who has now gone to sit by herself in the corner for, by the look of things, being into necrophilia, DP, scat, etc. Girl is made to feel as uncomfortable as possible; if she looks in their direction or makes eye contact, she gets ‘X-Rayed’: when someone literally looks through you because you don’t exist. [I’ve met a couple of Michaelis (ex) students, who are really, really good at this (all academies, even ones filled with science nerds, pick students that are able to do ‘the look’).]

Boy gang mentality would have it that once the fling/affair/shag is over, every sex position, ingrown toenail, pubic hairstyle, etc. is open to the public. The more serious the relationship, the more violent the reaction once it’s over. Few self respecting AJs get over it quickly and amicably: most moan and mop around for months. The smarter more manly ones do this to avoid any form of commitment (operation ‘wuss puss’) while getting laid by as many broads as possible (operation ‘sorry ass’). Either way, allowing their boys to strip search their exes with their eyes is somehow satisfying, “She’s been thrown into the trash, gentlemen, worth nothing anymore, a dirty old hag, a rag doll I’d wipe my ass with. Do with it as you please. Just for gods sakes keep it away from me!”

This is heavy artillery. AJs’ pussy footing prevents ACs (and there are many) from identifying a common enemy and tainting all potential stock; AJs are also highly adept at propaganda, in most instances having it on with as many women as possible, or acting rude, sexist, narcissistic and rough shod in female company, while appearing ‘artistic’, ‘cool’, ‘vulnerable’, or ‘valiant’. The better ones play the “every man a woman wants to change” card: a lover of all women: “You know I know you know?” A final category act rude, sexist, and narcissistic because they either cannot get laid, or feel a stone age urge to lord it over the ladies.

I wish to get in touch with my feminine side. Women brave or psychotic or stupid enough to be at the receiving end of the above - what do they do? What is their arsenal against this well oiled, slick, strongman boy gang collective machine that bounces around town on Good Year testes, fuelled by the almighty testosterone?

Suggestions: a) boobs b) jealousy – new guy c) giggle/plot in turn with female friends (‘dick stompers’) d) preempt – grow dead sexy, dump his ass and know that you’re in control because you’re his rage e) none of the above – provide other

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

who is polok

October 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM  
Blogger Linda Stupart said...

"...acting rude, sexist, narcissistic and rough shod in female company, while appearing ‘artistic’, ‘cool’, ‘vulnerable’, or ‘valiant’." is my favourite part...
I wrote this short story called 'The Day a Sunday Conceptualist threw my Feminism out the Window' (pending publication unfotunately so can't go here yet, but anyway, it was totally about this. One of the things that's always bothered me as well, is how come there aren't girl gangs like this? Not to necisarily discuss how crap the AJs are in bed, but at least to stand up for eachother?

October 16, 2009 at 1:02 AM  
Blogger Matthew Partridge said...

fully aware of the danger of slipping into the category for which you express such distaste, i say a big up!

but allow me to present a measured observation: beware of becoming reactionary. In times of revolution the danger is that whilst fighting the devil you in fact develop some of (his) characteristics.

October 19, 2009 at 12:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

(insert chewbaka noise)

October 19, 2009 at 4:20 AM  
Blogger Kitty Dörje said...

Dear Mr Pollack, if you want to get to know a girl stop being so in your face scary. Start asking and listening and you mighty be surprised what you learn.

November 19, 2009 at 1:44 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Collaborators

  • Linda Stupart
  • Robert Sloon
  • Natasha Norman
  • Andrew Putter
  • Ian Grose
  • Matthew King
  • Tony East
  • Craig Groenewald
  • Mike Rance
  • Natalie Pereira
  • Robert Sloon
  • Jem Smith
  • Jon Keevy
  • Georgina Gratrix
  • Colin Groenewald
  • Simon Tamblyn
  • Josh De Kock
  • Jonathan Kope
  • Shruthi Nair
  • Rebecca Haysom
  • Lauren Palte
  • Lauren Franklin
  • Matthew Hindley
  • Rose Kotze
  • Katherine Jacobs
  • Gareth Morris-Davies
  • Daniella Mooney
  • Karen Graaff
  • Andrew Lamprecht
  • Michael Michael
  • Michael Ilias Linders
  • Ed Young
  • James Webb
  • Daniella Mooney
  • Margaret Stone
  • Marco Filby
  • Hugh Upsher
  • Rowan Smith
  • Myer Taub
  • Ron T Beck
  • Marc Barben
  • Justin Brett
  • Paul Grose
  • Andrzej Nowicki
  • Johke Steenkamp
  • Julie Donald
  • Anna Stielau
  • Tim Liebbrandt
  • Jason Basson
  • Rebecca Haysom
  • Genevieve Louw
  • Charles Maggs
  • Wayne Barker

Return to ArtHeat

About Mixtape

Mixtape is a blog run (loosely) by Linda Stupart as a manifestation of a project in which she collaborates with a large group of smart, interesting, wonderful cultural producers. As such, Mixtape documents these collaborations. More than that, though, the blog serves as a space for each member of the project to post whatever they like: Tell us what they’re making, thinking, doing or, even, feeling. The blog also forms a space for Linda, a Cape Town based critic, artist, feminist, WWE fan and cultural commentator, to post her writing.

Previously on Mixtape

Mixtape Archives


Subscribe to posts here

Search Mixtape