Michaelis Grad Show 2009

Tuesday, January 26, 2010



It's a bit late but I thought it could do with some webtime...




The Michaelis Graduate Show is an annual highlight. New recruits at value for money. The buyers only gamble being whether the young artist will stay in the art world and make the purchase an investment or just wallpaper.


This year’s show was vested with a particularly high quality of installation. The onerous task of curating this vastly diverse group of artistic endeavours was handled particularly well, I felt, by graduating Master’s student, Justin Brett. Although an overarching theme is difficult to impose on a year of students charaterized by eccelectic individualism, many of the visual landscapes were reflective of personal concerns.


Most prevalent among non-white students was the issue of silencing with the hint of a hidden violence: a violation of spirit. This was expressed most vividly by Mohau Modisakeng in his installation of grounded loud-halers and a video work that drew feelings of fear and aggression in the broken breaths of the artist. Thuthuka (Tumie) Tumelo’s works of charred city scapes and unraveling parce flooring offered a bold criticism to the challenges and failures of ‘The City that Works for You.’ Nomuso Chiliza’s eery wall of facial impressions in plaster was a landscape of the gagged and the vanished body’s trace while Rehema Cachage’s carved wooden radio and video works that buzzed and hummed with inaudiable frequencies focused on a loss in transmission.


Equally as personal were the haunting suburbia paintings of Genevieve Louw. The Dutch gables of her childhood home behind an oppressive picket fence articulated a subtler form of domestic aggression and the myth of safety at home.


Longing for home and the great separation that Tumelo Kgomotso, a student from Botswana, endured from her husband and children in pursuit of her degree was poignantly expressed in an installation of wheelbarrows caste in hession and tattooed with the symbols of beaurocratic travel stamps and cellular top-up receipts. These working-class, load-bearing carts were tethered in the colonial architecture of Hiddingh Hall. It was a poignant reminder of the diasporic existence of many of Africa’s people.


Overarching economic and consumerist concerns were landscaped most memorably by Jody Paulsen in a paper and felt carnival of mostly American popular icons treated with a lyrical wit and irony. Also broadly political but of a different temperament entirely was Tony East’s incredibly fragile installation of porcelain birds and pollinators. Statistics of fruit, nut and vegetable exports reliant on a dwindling population of bees for production were mercilessly trampled underfoot by the hordes of visitors on opening night, a brutal metaphor to our own depleting natural resources.


Mainstream Michaelis works were still dominated by the affluence of English speaking intelligentsia that worked particularly hard this year to deliver with finesse and installational prowess. My favourites among this crew were Matthew King’s quest for answers in retro-pop collections of an emerging academic, Clare May van Blerck’s good housekeeping in a particularly filthy painting studio, Katherine Pichulik’s evocative apocalyptic industrial installation and Tim Leibbrandt’s remarkable filmic mash-up that considered human evolution ending in a nineties apocalypse. Charting a course between the personal and intellectual, Danielle Mooney’s romantic sculptures about the void were executed with genuine craftsmanship. Mooney’s appropriation of the white cube aesthetic successfully embued the works with a sweet sense of nostalgia and longing.


Creative energy is always refreshingly high at graduate shows but as is often the case these extraordinary bodies of work stand as the first revelationary fruits of four years of supervised tuition. Many of the students’ statements of intent formulated during the year seemed to exist as echoes of thoughts at the planting of this creative harvest, the trajectories of meaning and insights of these creative fruits remain something for these graduates to continue to consider for some time to come.


I leave the last word to Masters graduate, David Scadden. That trigger-happy-boy-interrupted who delivered an animation packed with fantastical overtures of doom and deliverance in a world gone bad. In his own words: ‘I met this lady who said she thought it was better than District 9. Fuck yeah, I’ll drink to that.’

Labels: ,

10 Comments:

Anonymous mona said...

ama-coloured;
ama-lungu:
ama-non-white:
ama-amazing.


please help me, is this what is known as "christmas cheer"? WTF

January 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It does seem strange to discuss 'non-white' students, and 'mainstream' (equaling white here) others...

Is it really like this over there???

January 28, 2010 at 2:32 AM  
Anonymous Neo-Humane said...

perhaps IF the "mlungus" of the"non-amalungu" called themselves non-black, or non-african, then this cradle would stop ROCKING.

Meanwhile, I am testing the notion that I am neo-human. Fuck You All. I am really angry.

January 28, 2010 at 2:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i think the author is intentionally pointing out that there is still a divide especially at michaelis

January 29, 2010 at 5:14 AM  
Anonymous mona said...

accepted, anonymous 5:14. But even the debates around transformation in soprt, for instance, don't and cannot use terminology like "non-white", "non-european" . We are living in Africa. Only racists (or perhaps more precisely those insensitive to being perceived as racists "because they speak like racists and therefore probably think like racists" ) would use this kind of terminology.
What the hell is wrong with differentiating between the majority and the rest withe the descriptive "non-black"?

January 29, 2010 at 6:26 AM  
Blogger Tash said...

Yes, anonymous, there still is a divide. I attended various student forums that this group of graduates initiated because issues of colour and its connection to culture still has a particular impact on how students make work and how work is received by a largley 'non-black' audience on campus.

In every institution there is a mainstream. The defining aspects of this stream shifts as staff and attitudes shift but I think it is useful to identify this stream so that we can be aware of whether this is what the institution unwittingly creates or whether it is what they are proud to be known for.

January 29, 2010 at 7:37 AM  
Anonymous hell-boy1 said...

Tash, I was hoping that is what you were getting at, but your language suggested something else. Now I am stumbling over your last sentence. You describe this mainstream as "shifting", and suggest that we can look at this fluidity as being either somehow created by the institution "UNWITTINGLY" or as something 'chosen': an outcome, or set of values, or a cultural matrix - I am not sure if these capture your intention - to be proud of.
Firstly, why does "unwittingly" have to set against "proud to be known for", as if the two were somehow opposite? Is it not possible that one of the aspects of racism is a certain hand in glove connivance - in the inner reaches of the self - between denial & the simultaneous (& spontaneous) generation of belief-valorising experiences. Counter-mythologies. What kind of Institution can be truly described as "Unwitting"

January 29, 2010 at 11:14 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

interesting that the article doesnt mention Chris Swift's work. Perhaps one of the only bodies of work on show dealing with cross-cultural identities. The outcome of his body of work to be installed in Crossroads, one of the poorest communities in Cape Town.

February 2, 2010 at 2:31 PM  
Blogger Tash said...

Non-white, non-black, neo-human...the responsibility of language is immense.

The issue of race is not a dead one in this country. It may feel better to side-set it, but a group of students (from varied racial backgrounds) rallied around the term 'Black' on campus in terms of an understanding of 'Black' as 'non-white' in that these students were reacting to what they perceived as a 'whiteness' in attitudes on campus. Indeed, this sentiment needs to be expanded. What is this 'whiteness' that these students take issue with? Is it, perhaps, a notion of the mainstream that these students feel excluded from?

February 3, 2010 at 6:26 AM  
Anonymous mohau said...

it always has to be something...i think they were very clear when they spoke about/against whiteness...if they meant mainstream they would have said...but i guess it cushions the blow to think of it as an issue that is directed as the invisible mainstream...

February 5, 2010 at 3:01 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Collaborators

  • Linda Stupart
  • Robert Sloon
  • Natasha Norman
  • Andrew Putter
  • Ian Grose
  • Matthew King
  • Tony East
  • Craig Groenewald
  • Mike Rance
  • Natalie Pereira
  • Robert Sloon
  • Jem Smith
  • Jon Keevy
  • Georgina Gratrix
  • Colin Groenewald
  • Simon Tamblyn
  • Josh De Kock
  • Jonathan Kope
  • Shruthi Nair
  • Rebecca Haysom
  • Lauren Palte
  • Lauren Franklin
  • Matthew Hindley
  • Rose Kotze
  • Katherine Jacobs
  • Gareth Morris-Davies
  • Daniella Mooney
  • Karen Graaff
  • Andrew Lamprecht
  • Michael Michael
  • Michael Ilias Linders
  • Ed Young
  • James Webb
  • Daniella Mooney
  • Margaret Stone
  • Marco Filby
  • Hugh Upsher
  • Rowan Smith
  • Myer Taub
  • Ron T Beck
  • Marc Barben
  • Justin Brett
  • Paul Grose
  • Andrzej Nowicki
  • Johke Steenkamp
  • Julie Donald
  • Anna Stielau
  • Tim Liebbrandt
  • Jason Basson
  • Rebecca Haysom
  • Genevieve Louw
  • Charles Maggs
  • Wayne Barker

Return to ArtHeat

About Mixtape

Mixtape is a blog run (loosely) by Linda Stupart as a manifestation of a project in which she collaborates with a large group of smart, interesting, wonderful cultural producers. As such, Mixtape documents these collaborations. More than that, though, the blog serves as a space for each member of the project to post whatever they like: Tell us what they’re making, thinking, doing or, even, feeling. The blog also forms a space for Linda, a Cape Town based critic, artist, feminist, WWE fan and cultural commentator, to post her writing.

Previously on Mixtape

Mixtape Archives


Subscribe to posts here

Search Mixtape